Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Grant of Regular Bail - In a case where the State sought to challenge the grant of regular bail to the respondent-accused, the High Court of Gujarat considered the arguments presented by both parties. While the State vehemently argued for bail cancellation, citing the failure to consider relevant factors and objections, the respondent's counsel supported the impugned order, pointing to the precedent of a co-accused being granted bail without challenge. Despite serious allegations leveled by the State regarding a significant financial scam, the Court found no such circumstances affecting the fairness of the trial or breaching bail conditions. - Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the impugned order and discharging the rule.
Grant of Regular Bail - In a case where the State sought to challenge the grant of regular bail to the respondent-accused, the High Court of Gujarat considered the arguments presented by both parties. While the State vehemently argued for bail cancellation, citing the failure to consider relevant factors and objections, the respondent's counsel supported the impugned order, pointing to the precedent of a co-accused being granted bail without challenge. Despite serious allegations leveled by the State regarding a significant financial scam, the Court found no such circumstances affecting the fairness of the trial or breaching bail conditions. - Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the impugned order and discharging the rule.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
