Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Grant of Regular Bail - In a case where the State sought to challenge the grant of regular bail to the respondent-accused, the High Court of Gujarat considered the arguments presented by both parties. While the State vehemently argued for bail cancellation, citing the failure to consider relevant factors and objections, the respondent's counsel supported the impugned order, pointing to the precedent of a co-accused being granted bail without challenge. Despite serious allegations leveled by the State regarding a significant financial scam, the Court found no such circumstances affecting the fairness of the trial or breaching bail conditions. - Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the impugned order and discharging the rule.
Grant of Regular Bail - In a case where the State sought to challenge the grant of regular bail to the respondent-accused, the High Court of Gujarat considered the arguments presented by both parties. While the State vehemently argued for bail cancellation, citing the failure to consider relevant factors and objections, the respondent's counsel supported the impugned order, pointing to the precedent of a co-accused being granted bail without challenge. Despite serious allegations leveled by the State regarding a significant financial scam, the Court found no such circumstances affecting the fairness of the trial or breaching bail conditions. - Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the impugned order and discharging the rule.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.