Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Availing and utilization of Input Tax Credit - The applicant had initially opted to pay GST at a lower rate without availing full ITC on goods and services used in their supplies. Consequently, they forfeited the right to claim ITC on purchases made during that period. The supplier reported the sale of the motor vehicle in their GSTR-01 for July 2023, while the applicant claimed that the invoice was dated August 4, 2023. However, the Authority concluded that the supply occurred in July 2023, during the period when the applicant was still availing the lower rate of tax without full ITC. - The AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING (AAR) ruled that the applicant was not eligible to claim input tax credit on the purchase of the motor vehicle due to the timing of the supply and their previous tax payment and ITC policy.
Availing and utilization of Input Tax Credit - The applicant had initially opted to pay GST at a lower rate without availing full ITC on goods and services used in their supplies. Consequently, they forfeited the right to claim ITC on purchases made during that period. The supplier reported the sale of the motor vehicle in their GSTR-01 for July 2023, while the applicant claimed that the invoice was dated August 4, 2023. However, the Authority concluded that the supply occurred in July 2023, during the period when the applicant was still availing the lower rate of tax without full ITC. - The AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING (AAR) ruled that the applicant was not eligible to claim input tax credit on the purchase of the motor vehicle due to the timing of the supply and their previous tax payment and ITC policy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
