Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - genuineness and creditworthiness of the share capital subscription challenged - ITAT deleted addition - The Delhi High Court upheld the decisions of the ITAT, which had favorably considered the assessee's appeals against the substantial additions imposed by the Assessing Officer. The court found that the ITAT had correctly applied the legal principles to the facts, which were thoroughly vetted and substantiated by adequate evidence. Thus, no substantial questions of law arose from the ITAT’s decisions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - genuineness and creditworthiness of the share capital subscription challenged - ITAT deleted addition - The Delhi High Court upheld the decisions of the ITAT, which had favorably considered the assessee's appeals against the substantial additions imposed by the Assessing Officer. The court found that the ITAT had correctly applied the legal principles to the facts, which were thoroughly vetted and substantiated by adequate evidence. Thus, no substantial questions of law arose from the ITAT’s decisions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.