Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Condonation of delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal u/s 260-A - Revenue's appeal - The court found that the appellant failed to provide a valid explanation for the delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal. Despite the previous appeal being declared infructuous, the court held that it had no relevance to the current appeal, as they pertained to different orders. The court cited a precedent to emphasize that negligence in prosecuting the matter cannot be condoned merely because the government is a party. It highlighted the need for plausible and acceptable explanations for delays.
Condonation of delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal u/s 260-A - Revenue's appeal - The court found that the appellant failed to provide a valid explanation for the delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal. Despite the previous appeal being declared infructuous, the court held that it had no relevance to the current appeal, as they pertained to different orders. The court cited a precedent to emphasize that negligence in prosecuting the matter cannot be condoned merely because the government is a party. It highlighted the need for plausible and acceptable explanations for delays.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
