Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Condonation of delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal u/s 260-A - Revenue's appeal - The court found that the appellant failed to provide a valid explanation for the delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal. Despite the previous appeal being declared infructuous, the court held that it had no relevance to the current appeal, as they pertained to different orders. The court cited a precedent to emphasize that negligence in prosecuting the matter cannot be condoned merely because the government is a party. It highlighted the need for plausible and acceptable explanations for delays.
Condonation of delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal u/s 260-A - Revenue's appeal - The court found that the appellant failed to provide a valid explanation for the delay of 1085 days in filing the appeal. Despite the previous appeal being declared infructuous, the court held that it had no relevance to the current appeal, as they pertained to different orders. The court cited a precedent to emphasize that negligence in prosecuting the matter cannot be condoned merely because the government is a party. It highlighted the need for plausible and acceptable explanations for delays.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
