Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
TDS u/s 194H - assessee is a cellular mobile service providers - Aligning with the Supreme Court's judgment, the Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the discounts given to distributors are not commissions and that the relationship between the parties is of principal to principal. Consequently, the appellant is not required to deduct tax at source under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act concerning the discounts offered to distributors.
TDS u/s 194H - assessee is a cellular mobile service providers - Aligning with the Supreme Court's judgment, the Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the discounts given to distributors are not commissions and that the relationship between the parties is of principal to principal. Consequently, the appellant is not required to deduct tax at source under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act concerning the discounts offered to distributors.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
