Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer issued the notice based on the survey action on Jammu & Kashmir Bank, conducted after the original assessment order. The Court concluded that the notice was not issued due to any fresh tangible material but rather on the basis of the same material already available during the original assessment proceedings. The Court noted that the discrepancies in remittance amounts were explained by the bank's practice of applying notional and actual rates during transaction processing. The High Court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer issued the notice based on the survey action on Jammu & Kashmir Bank, conducted after the original assessment order. The Court concluded that the notice was not issued due to any fresh tangible material but rather on the basis of the same material already available during the original assessment proceedings. The Court noted that the discrepancies in remittance amounts were explained by the bank's practice of applying notional and actual rates during transaction processing. The High Court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
