Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain the appeal related to duty drawback - confiscation of goods - The High Court referred to a precedent where it was held that an order passed by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction is null and void. It concurred with the appellant's interpretation of the law, acknowledging that the remedy for impugning such orders lies in Revision to the Central Government, not by appeal to the Tribunal. The High Court set aside the impugned order and granted the respondent an opportunity to file a Revision under Section 129(DD) of the Act within two months.
Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain the appeal related to duty drawback - confiscation of goods - The High Court referred to a precedent where it was held that an order passed by a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction is null and void. It concurred with the appellant's interpretation of the law, acknowledging that the remedy for impugning such orders lies in Revision to the Central Government, not by appeal to the Tribunal. The High Court set aside the impugned order and granted the respondent an opportunity to file a Revision under Section 129(DD) of the Act within two months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.