Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Power of High Court to entertain writ petition - alternative efficacious remedy u/s 129A - The court decided not to entertain the petitions on the basis of the alternative remedies available and the non-fulfillment of the requests for procedural rights not resulting in substantial prejudice that couldn't be remedied through the appeals process. The court dismissed the petitions but allowed the petitioners to appeal to the CESTAT, instructing the tribunal to consider their appeals without regard to the delay caused by the High Court proceedings.
Power of High Court to entertain writ petition - alternative efficacious remedy u/s 129A - The court decided not to entertain the petitions on the basis of the alternative remedies available and the non-fulfillment of the requests for procedural rights not resulting in substantial prejudice that couldn't be remedied through the appeals process. The court dismissed the petitions but allowed the petitioners to appeal to the CESTAT, instructing the tribunal to consider their appeals without regard to the delay caused by the High Court proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
