Revenue neutrality in domestic related-party loans can require deletion of interest transfer pricing adjustments after domestic-transaction verificati...
Pre-enactment land-sale agreements escape stamp-duty value substitution where substantial banking-channel consideration was received before Section 43...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of CVD/SAD paid - Unable to avail and utilize the credit of CVD/SAD paid by them as payment was made on 30.09.2020 when no provision exist in GST regime to avail such credit - The Appellate Tribunal observed that since the duty payments were made prior to the implementation of the GST regime, during the period when the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, were in force, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit for the duties paid. Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, provided a remedy for situations where taxpayers couldn't avail or utilize Cenvat credit due to the transition to the GST regime. It allowed refunds for duties that were cenvatable under the previous law, i.e., Central Excise Act, 1944, and rules made thereunder. - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the refund claim of the appellant.
Refund of CVD/SAD paid - Unable to avail and utilize the credit of CVD/SAD paid by them as payment was made on 30.09.2020 when no provision exist in GST regime to avail such credit - The Appellate Tribunal observed that since the duty payments were made prior to the implementation of the GST regime, during the period when the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, were in force, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit for the duties paid. Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, provided a remedy for situations where taxpayers couldn't avail or utilize Cenvat credit due to the transition to the GST regime. It allowed refunds for duties that were cenvatable under the previous law, i.e., Central Excise Act, 1944, and rules made thereunder. - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the refund claim of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
