Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of CVD/SAD paid - Unable to avail and utilize the credit of CVD/SAD paid by them as payment was made on 30.09.2020 when no provision exist in GST regime to avail such credit - The Appellate Tribunal observed that since the duty payments were made prior to the implementation of the GST regime, during the period when the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, were in force, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit for the duties paid. Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, provided a remedy for situations where taxpayers couldn't avail or utilize Cenvat credit due to the transition to the GST regime. It allowed refunds for duties that were cenvatable under the previous law, i.e., Central Excise Act, 1944, and rules made thereunder. - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the refund claim of the appellant.
Refund of CVD/SAD paid - Unable to avail and utilize the credit of CVD/SAD paid by them as payment was made on 30.09.2020 when no provision exist in GST regime to avail such credit - The Appellate Tribunal observed that since the duty payments were made prior to the implementation of the GST regime, during the period when the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, were in force, the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit for the duties paid. Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, provided a remedy for situations where taxpayers couldn't avail or utilize Cenvat credit due to the transition to the GST regime. It allowed refunds for duties that were cenvatable under the previous law, i.e., Central Excise Act, 1944, and rules made thereunder. - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the refund claim of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
