Post-search scrutiny assessment remains available where original assessment limitation is unexpired, permitting timely completion under regular assess...
Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Attachment by the sales tax authorities over an apartment in Mumbai - priority of charges - The High Court concludes that the petitioner, as the auction purchaser, holds a valid and marketable title to the apartment, free from encumbrances claimed by the sales tax authorities. This determination is based on the priority of security interests established under the SARFAESI Act. - Despite attachment orders issued by the sales tax authorities, the absence of registration with CERSAI and the failure to issue a proclamation of sale invalidate their claims to priority over the secured creditor. By analyzing relevant statutory provisions and legal precedents, the court clarifies that the sales tax authorities cannot supersede the rights of secured creditors.
Attachment by the sales tax authorities over an apartment in Mumbai - priority of charges - The High Court concludes that the petitioner, as the auction purchaser, holds a valid and marketable title to the apartment, free from encumbrances claimed by the sales tax authorities. This determination is based on the priority of security interests established under the SARFAESI Act. - Despite attachment orders issued by the sales tax authorities, the absence of registration with CERSAI and the failure to issue a proclamation of sale invalidate their claims to priority over the secured creditor. By analyzing relevant statutory provisions and legal precedents, the court clarifies that the sales tax authorities cannot supersede the rights of secured creditors.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.