Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient funds - discharge of legal liability - A scenarios involving financial transactions with potentially fraudulent undertones - The High court noted that this presumption is rebuttable and that the defense had successfully cast doubt on the existence of the alleged debt. - Significant to this case was the finding on the financial capacity of the petitioner. Evidence and circumstances suggested that the petitioner’s financial status was inconsistent with the ability to lend the amounts claimed. - The High Court upheld the appellate court’s decision to acquit the accused, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence on the petitioner's ability to lend such an amount and the improbability of the debt’s existence.
Dishonour of Cheque - insufficient funds - discharge of legal liability - A scenarios involving financial transactions with potentially fraudulent undertones - The High court noted that this presumption is rebuttable and that the defense had successfully cast doubt on the existence of the alleged debt. - Significant to this case was the finding on the financial capacity of the petitioner. Evidence and circumstances suggested that the petitioner’s financial status was inconsistent with the ability to lend the amounts claimed. - The High Court upheld the appellate court’s decision to acquit the accused, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence on the petitioner's ability to lend such an amount and the improbability of the debt’s existence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
