Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of assessment made u/s 147 instead of u/s. 153C - Addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 - Upon examination, the ITAT Delhi found that the seized material, along with statements by involved parties, constituted incriminating evidence, warranting proceedings under section 153C. Citing precedent from various judicial decisions, the ITAT Delhi concluded that the failure to follow the procedure under section 153C invalidated the reassessment under section 147/148. Consequently, the ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to quash the reassessment.
Validity of assessment made u/s 147 instead of u/s. 153C - Addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 - Upon examination, the ITAT Delhi found that the seized material, along with statements by involved parties, constituted incriminating evidence, warranting proceedings under section 153C. Citing precedent from various judicial decisions, the ITAT Delhi concluded that the failure to follow the procedure under section 153C invalidated the reassessment under section 147/148. Consequently, the ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to quash the reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
