Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of assessment made u/s 147 instead of u/s. 153C - Addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 - Upon examination, the ITAT Delhi found that the seized material, along with statements by involved parties, constituted incriminating evidence, warranting proceedings under section 153C. Citing precedent from various judicial decisions, the ITAT Delhi concluded that the failure to follow the procedure under section 153C invalidated the reassessment under section 147/148. Consequently, the ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to quash the reassessment.
Validity of assessment made u/s 147 instead of u/s. 153C - Addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 - Upon examination, the ITAT Delhi found that the seized material, along with statements by involved parties, constituted incriminating evidence, warranting proceedings under section 153C. Citing precedent from various judicial decisions, the ITAT Delhi concluded that the failure to follow the procedure under section 153C invalidated the reassessment under section 147/148. Consequently, the ITAT Delhi upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to quash the reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.