Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - disallowance made u/s. 35(2AB) - The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that the term 'particulars' under section 271(1)(c) includes the details of the claim made. In the absence of any incorrect or inaccurate information provided in the return, penalty cannot be imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars. - Since the DSIR approval was not available to the assessee at the time of filing the return, any subsequent restriction on the deduction claimed cannot be considered as furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - disallowance made u/s. 35(2AB) - The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that the term 'particulars' under section 271(1)(c) includes the details of the claim made. In the absence of any incorrect or inaccurate information provided in the return, penalty cannot be imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars. - Since the DSIR approval was not available to the assessee at the time of filing the return, any subsequent restriction on the deduction claimed cannot be considered as furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
