Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite the assessing officer invoking section 68 of the Income Tax Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the addition under section 41(1), citing long-standing outstanding credits. However, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding insufficient evidence of cessation of liabilities. Specific cases were examined, and additions were deleted due to lack of evidence or the appellant's satisfactory explanations.
Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite the assessing officer invoking section 68 of the Income Tax Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the addition under section 41(1), citing long-standing outstanding credits. However, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding insufficient evidence of cessation of liabilities. Specific cases were examined, and additions were deleted due to lack of evidence or the appellant's satisfactory explanations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.