Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking cancellation of the GST registration - The case involved a petitioner seeking cancellation of their GST registration due to the closure of their business operations. Despite two applications for cancellation, the respondent rejected them without providing valid reasons. The High Court found the rejection unjustified, emphasizing that unless the revenue's interests were compromised, there were no grounds for refusal. It ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the cancellation of the registration with effect from the date of the initial application. The court clarified that the respondent could still pursue recovery of any dues in accordance with the law.
Seeking cancellation of the GST registration - The case involved a petitioner seeking cancellation of their GST registration due to the closure of their business operations. Despite two applications for cancellation, the respondent rejected them without providing valid reasons. The High Court found the rejection unjustified, emphasizing that unless the revenue's interests were compromised, there were no grounds for refusal. It ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the cancellation of the registration with effect from the date of the initial application. The court clarified that the respondent could still pursue recovery of any dues in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.