Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
LTCG - deduction u/s 54 denied - Despite the assessee's claim of having constructed a residential property within the specified timeframe, a physical inspection revealed the inadequacy of the alleged residential house. The property lacked basic amenities necessary for habitation, such as proper boundary walls, kitchen, electricity, and water connections. Certificates provided by the assessee were deemed insufficient to counter the findings of the physical inspection. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the decision to deny the deduction under section 54, ruling that the assessee had not constructed a residential house within the prescribed time and without the necessary amenities for dwelling.
LTCG - deduction u/s 54 denied - Despite the assessee's claim of having constructed a residential property within the specified timeframe, a physical inspection revealed the inadequacy of the alleged residential house. The property lacked basic amenities necessary for habitation, such as proper boundary walls, kitchen, electricity, and water connections. Certificates provided by the assessee were deemed insufficient to counter the findings of the physical inspection. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the decision to deny the deduction under section 54, ruling that the assessee had not constructed a residential house within the prescribed time and without the necessary amenities for dwelling.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.