Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Validity of assessment framed u/s 143(3) by Non- jurisdictional ITO - Jurisdiction of AO based on income threshold / monetary limits as per the return of income - The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, primarily focusing on the jurisdictional issue. It held that the notice issued by the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction due to the appellant's income exceeding the threshold. Consequently, the assessment was quashed as void ab initio.
Validity of assessment framed u/s 143(3) by Non- jurisdictional ITO - Jurisdiction of AO based on income threshold / monetary limits as per the return of income - The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, primarily focusing on the jurisdictional issue. It held that the notice issued by the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction due to the appellant's income exceeding the threshold. Consequently, the assessment was quashed as void ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
