Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. It held that the responsibility of the firm ends once it provides satisfactory evidence regarding the introduction of capital by its partners. The Tribunal cited precedents where it was established that once the partner invests capital, the burden shifts to that individual to explain the source of the investment. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the AO.
Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. It held that the responsibility of the firm ends once it provides satisfactory evidence regarding the introduction of capital by its partners. The Tribunal cited precedents where it was established that once the partner invests capital, the burden shifts to that individual to explain the source of the investment. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
