Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. It held that the responsibility of the firm ends once it provides satisfactory evidence regarding the introduction of capital by its partners. The Tribunal cited precedents where it was established that once the partner invests capital, the burden shifts to that individual to explain the source of the investment. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the AO.
Addition u/s 68 in the hands of partnership firm - capital introduced by five partners, which in turn was out of the loan advanced - The Appellate Tribunal (AT) examined the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. It held that the responsibility of the firm ends once it provides satisfactory evidence regarding the introduction of capital by its partners. The Tribunal cited precedents where it was established that once the partner invests capital, the burden shifts to that individual to explain the source of the investment. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
