Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Scope of SCN - impugned order proceeds on a completely different basis from the SCN - Entitlement to ITC - The High Court observed a clear disparity between the initial show cause notice and the final order. While the notice alleged sales suppression and proposed a specific tax liability, the order imposed a significantly higher amount without justification. Notably, the impugned order did not rely on sales suppression as a basis for its decision, raising questions about the rationale behind the increased tax liability. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order.
Scope of SCN - impugned order proceeds on a completely different basis from the SCN - Entitlement to ITC - The High Court observed a clear disparity between the initial show cause notice and the final order. While the notice alleged sales suppression and proposed a specific tax liability, the order imposed a significantly higher amount without justification. Notably, the impugned order did not rely on sales suppression as a basis for its decision, raising questions about the rationale behind the increased tax liability. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.