Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration - The show cause notice issued to the petitioner did not specify any cogent reason for cancellation but merely stated the non-filing of returns for six months. Moreover, it failed to indicate the date and time for the petitioner's appearance for a personal hearing. The High Court emphasized that the cancellation of GST registration, especially with retrospective effect, must be based on objective criteria and not merely because of non-filing of returns. The court modified the impugned order to cancel the registration with effect from the date the petitioner filed the application for cancellation. - However, it allowed the respondent to take appropriate steps for recovery of taxes, penalties, or interest as per the law.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration - The show cause notice issued to the petitioner did not specify any cogent reason for cancellation but merely stated the non-filing of returns for six months. Moreover, it failed to indicate the date and time for the petitioner's appearance for a personal hearing. The High Court emphasized that the cancellation of GST registration, especially with retrospective effect, must be based on objective criteria and not merely because of non-filing of returns. The court modified the impugned order to cancel the registration with effect from the date the petitioner filed the application for cancellation. - However, it allowed the respondent to take appropriate steps for recovery of taxes, penalties, or interest as per the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
