Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Revision u/s 263 - source of cash found in the course of search remains unexplained and additions u/s 69A r.w. Section 115BBE - The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's defense regarding the source of cash found during the search. It noted that the appellant had provided reasonable explanations, including references to previous years' balances, which were accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO). - Regarding the issue of jewellery, the Tribunal highlighted the lack of opportunity provided to the appellant by the Pr.CIT to address this matter. It emphasized that principles of natural justice were breached, as the appellant was not given a chance to defend against the allegations related to jewellery. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the revisional order and upheld the appellant's appeals.
Revision u/s 263 - source of cash found in the course of search remains unexplained and additions u/s 69A r.w. Section 115BBE - The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's defense regarding the source of cash found during the search. It noted that the appellant had provided reasonable explanations, including references to previous years' balances, which were accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO). - Regarding the issue of jewellery, the Tribunal highlighted the lack of opportunity provided to the appellant by the Pr.CIT to address this matter. It emphasized that principles of natural justice were breached, as the appellant was not given a chance to defend against the allegations related to jewellery. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the revisional order and upheld the appellant's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
