Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Approval of a resolution plan - The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by dissenting homebuyers, citing that since the homebuyers as a class assented to the plans, individual challenges to the resolution plan were not maintainable. - Previous applications challenging the validity of the sub-lease agreement were dismissed by the Tribunal, as the transaction occurred prior to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), without evidence of fraud or intent to deprive homebuyers' rights. - The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection regarding the competence of maintaining the appeal by the appellants, emphasizing that dissenting homebuyers must follow the decision of the majority within their class.
Approval of a resolution plan - The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by dissenting homebuyers, citing that since the homebuyers as a class assented to the plans, individual challenges to the resolution plan were not maintainable. - Previous applications challenging the validity of the sub-lease agreement were dismissed by the Tribunal, as the transaction occurred prior to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), without evidence of fraud or intent to deprive homebuyers' rights. - The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection regarding the competence of maintaining the appeal by the appellants, emphasizing that dissenting homebuyers must follow the decision of the majority within their class.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.