Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Approval of a resolution plan - The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by dissenting homebuyers, citing that since the homebuyers as a class assented to the plans, individual challenges to the resolution plan were not maintainable. - Previous applications challenging the validity of the sub-lease agreement were dismissed by the Tribunal, as the transaction occurred prior to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), without evidence of fraud or intent to deprive homebuyers' rights. - The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection regarding the competence of maintaining the appeal by the appellants, emphasizing that dissenting homebuyers must follow the decision of the majority within their class.
Approval of a resolution plan - The Tribunal dismissed objections raised by dissenting homebuyers, citing that since the homebuyers as a class assented to the plans, individual challenges to the resolution plan were not maintainable. - Previous applications challenging the validity of the sub-lease agreement were dismissed by the Tribunal, as the transaction occurred prior to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), without evidence of fraud or intent to deprive homebuyers' rights. - The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection regarding the competence of maintaining the appeal by the appellants, emphasizing that dissenting homebuyers must follow the decision of the majority within their class.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.