Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills, without additional evidence indicating an intention to evade tax, should not lead to penalty imposition. It highlighted a precedent where a similar typographical error was deemed insignificant, emphasizing that such errors do not necessarily imply tax evasion. Consequently, the Court quashed the impugned orders and directed the refund of the deposited tax and penalty amount.
Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills, without additional evidence indicating an intention to evade tax, should not lead to penalty imposition. It highlighted a precedent where a similar typographical error was deemed insignificant, emphasizing that such errors do not necessarily imply tax evasion. Consequently, the Court quashed the impugned orders and directed the refund of the deposited tax and penalty amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.