Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - Assumption of jurisdiction to make an assessment - No return of income filed by assessee - Whether a curable defect u/s 292BB - The Assessee argued that as there was no return of income filed at the time of the notice, the assumption of jurisdiction for assessment was flawed. The Department contended that any irregularity in the notice could be cured under section 292BB of the Act. However, the Tribunal found that the notice was issued before the Assessee filed their return of income, rendering the assumption of jurisdiction invalid. Despite the Department's arguments, the Tribunal held that the notice was not in accordance with the Act and could not be cured under section 292BB.
Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - Assumption of jurisdiction to make an assessment - No return of income filed by assessee - Whether a curable defect u/s 292BB - The Assessee argued that as there was no return of income filed at the time of the notice, the assumption of jurisdiction for assessment was flawed. The Department contended that any irregularity in the notice could be cured under section 292BB of the Act. However, the Tribunal found that the notice was issued before the Assessee filed their return of income, rendering the assumption of jurisdiction invalid. Despite the Department's arguments, the Tribunal held that the notice was not in accordance with the Act and could not be cured under section 292BB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.