Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 29, 2024Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - NCLAT admitted the application u/s 7 - NPA - Relevant date of default - The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to initiate CIRP against the corporate debtor. The Tribunal confirmed that the declaration of the loan as an NPA on the due date for lack of payment beyond 90 days stands as the valid default date. This decision was supported by the regulatory definitions and reinforced by supreme court rulings that align NPA declarations with the default dates under the IBC. The arguments by the Appellant regarding the necessity of a cure period notice were dismissed by the Tribunal, which cited that the financial institution's actions were within legal bounds and supported by judicial precedents.
Initiation of CIRP - NCLAT admitted the application u/s 7 - NPA - Relevant date of default - The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to initiate CIRP against the corporate debtor. The Tribunal confirmed that the declaration of the loan as an NPA on the due date for lack of payment beyond 90 days stands as the valid default date. This decision was supported by the regulatory definitions and reinforced by supreme court rulings that align NPA declarations with the default dates under the IBC. The arguments by the Appellant regarding the necessity of a cure period notice were dismissed by the Tribunal, which cited that the financial institution's actions were within legal bounds and supported by judicial precedents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
