Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Calculation of Tax Liability based on subsequent year's Balance Sheet - non-service of SCN - Obligation to monitor GST Portal - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the incorrect use of financial statements for the assessment period. It noted that the respondent should have utilized the 2017-2018 balance sheet for adjudication, rather than the subsequent year's balance sheet. - While acknowledging the petitioner's obligation to monitor the GST portal regularly, the court emphasized the need for proper communication of official notices. However, it also held the petitioner accountable for not responding to the notice within the stipulated period. - Matter restored back, subject to remit a specified sum as a condition for remand.
Calculation of Tax Liability based on subsequent year's Balance Sheet - non-service of SCN - Obligation to monitor GST Portal - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the incorrect use of financial statements for the assessment period. It noted that the respondent should have utilized the 2017-2018 balance sheet for adjudication, rather than the subsequent year's balance sheet. - While acknowledging the petitioner's obligation to monitor the GST portal regularly, the court emphasized the need for proper communication of official notices. However, it also held the petitioner accountable for not responding to the notice within the stipulated period. - Matter restored back, subject to remit a specified sum as a condition for remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.