Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from 2011 should apply to the proceedings. The Court found that the purpose of the amendment to the penalty rules was to achieve a proper balance between the offence and the penalty, reflecting a shift toward a more equitable approach in the imposition of penalties. - The Court clarified that once a rule is substituted, the old rule ceases to exist entirely and should not be applied to ongoing or future proceedings.
Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from 2011 should apply to the proceedings. The Court found that the purpose of the amendment to the penalty rules was to achieve a proper balance between the offence and the penalty, reflecting a shift toward a more equitable approach in the imposition of penalties. - The Court clarified that once a rule is substituted, the old rule ceases to exist entirely and should not be applied to ongoing or future proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.