Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed to provide an opportunity for cross-examination to the assessee, which was a violation of the principles of natural justice. It noted judgments that stressed the importance of allowing the assessee to rebut any adverse evidence. The Tribunal concluded that in the absence of the quantum addition, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not stand.
Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed to provide an opportunity for cross-examination to the assessee, which was a violation of the principles of natural justice. It noted judgments that stressed the importance of allowing the assessee to rebut any adverse evidence. The Tribunal concluded that in the absence of the quantum addition, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not stand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.