Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment of service tax, even under an amnesty scheme, necessitated interest payment as a corollary. Therefore, the appellant's contention for exemption from interest payment was deemed untenable. Regarding the refund claim, the tribunal affirmed that the appellant's payment of service tax without contestation implied acceptance of the department's stance. Additionally, the tribunal reasoned that the amnesty scheme, under which the appellant paid the tax, did not absolve them from interest liability.
Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment of service tax, even under an amnesty scheme, necessitated interest payment as a corollary. Therefore, the appellant's contention for exemption from interest payment was deemed untenable. Regarding the refund claim, the tribunal affirmed that the appellant's payment of service tax without contestation implied acceptance of the department's stance. Additionally, the tribunal reasoned that the amnesty scheme, under which the appellant paid the tax, did not absolve them from interest liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
