Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
100% EOU - Levy of Excise Duty on wastages - shortages - handling loss - The tribunal noted substantial discrepancies between the iron ore quantities reported and the actual quantities exported. The appellant argued these discrepancies were due to cumulative losses over several years, which were common in the industry. However, the tribunal found no proper documentation or verification from the appellant substantiating these claims. The tribunal found that the appellant had contravened the stipulated conditions by failing to pay duties on the iron ore claimed as handling losses. The concessions under the notification were not applicable due to non-compliance with the notification’s conditions. - The tribunal supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation.
100% EOU - Levy of Excise Duty on wastages - shortages - handling loss - The tribunal noted substantial discrepancies between the iron ore quantities reported and the actual quantities exported. The appellant argued these discrepancies were due to cumulative losses over several years, which were common in the industry. However, the tribunal found no proper documentation or verification from the appellant substantiating these claims. The tribunal found that the appellant had contravened the stipulated conditions by failing to pay duties on the iron ore claimed as handling losses. The concessions under the notification were not applicable due to non-compliance with the notification’s conditions. - The tribunal supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.