Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
100% EOU - Levy of Excise Duty on wastages - shortages - handling loss - The tribunal noted substantial discrepancies between the iron ore quantities reported and the actual quantities exported. The appellant argued these discrepancies were due to cumulative losses over several years, which were common in the industry. However, the tribunal found no proper documentation or verification from the appellant substantiating these claims. The tribunal found that the appellant had contravened the stipulated conditions by failing to pay duties on the iron ore claimed as handling losses. The concessions under the notification were not applicable due to non-compliance with the notification’s conditions. - The tribunal supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation.
100% EOU - Levy of Excise Duty on wastages - shortages - handling loss - The tribunal noted substantial discrepancies between the iron ore quantities reported and the actual quantities exported. The appellant argued these discrepancies were due to cumulative losses over several years, which were common in the industry. However, the tribunal found no proper documentation or verification from the appellant substantiating these claims. The tribunal found that the appellant had contravened the stipulated conditions by failing to pay duties on the iron ore claimed as handling losses. The concessions under the notification were not applicable due to non-compliance with the notification’s conditions. - The tribunal supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
