Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Demand of late fee u/s 47(1) of the CGST / SGST Act - delay in filing of returns - Amnesty Scheme - GST portal does not support payment of late fee for late filing GSTR-9C - The High court ruled that late fees are leviable up to the late filing of the GSTR-9 return and not the GSTR-9C reconciliation statement. - The court noted the introduction of an amnesty scheme by the Central Government, which waived late fees in excess of Rs. 10,000 for non-filers of returns for certain financial years. The petitioner had filed their annual return before the commencement of this scheme, and thus argued for the benefit of the notifications. The court agreed with this contention and found the notices for non-payment of late fees unjust and unsustainable.
Demand of late fee u/s 47(1) of the CGST / SGST Act - delay in filing of returns - Amnesty Scheme - GST portal does not support payment of late fee for late filing GSTR-9C - The High court ruled that late fees are leviable up to the late filing of the GSTR-9 return and not the GSTR-9C reconciliation statement. - The court noted the introduction of an amnesty scheme by the Central Government, which waived late fees in excess of Rs. 10,000 for non-filers of returns for certain financial years. The petitioner had filed their annual return before the commencement of this scheme, and thus argued for the benefit of the notifications. The court agreed with this contention and found the notices for non-payment of late fees unjust and unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
