Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Demand of late fee u/s 47(1) of the CGST / SGST Act - delay in filing of returns - Amnesty Scheme - GST portal does not support payment of late fee for late filing GSTR-9C - The High court ruled that late fees are leviable up to the late filing of the GSTR-9 return and not the GSTR-9C reconciliation statement. - The court noted the introduction of an amnesty scheme by the Central Government, which waived late fees in excess of Rs. 10,000 for non-filers of returns for certain financial years. The petitioner had filed their annual return before the commencement of this scheme, and thus argued for the benefit of the notifications. The court agreed with this contention and found the notices for non-payment of late fees unjust and unsustainable.
Demand of late fee u/s 47(1) of the CGST / SGST Act - delay in filing of returns - Amnesty Scheme - GST portal does not support payment of late fee for late filing GSTR-9C - The High court ruled that late fees are leviable up to the late filing of the GSTR-9 return and not the GSTR-9C reconciliation statement. - The court noted the introduction of an amnesty scheme by the Central Government, which waived late fees in excess of Rs. 10,000 for non-filers of returns for certain financial years. The petitioner had filed their annual return before the commencement of this scheme, and thus argued for the benefit of the notifications. The court agreed with this contention and found the notices for non-payment of late fees unjust and unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
