Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deemed income u/s 56(2)(x) - Defective Show cause notice - Addition of Unexplained investment u/s 69 - charged to tax u/s 115BBE - The High Court found that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner was defective as it did not specify whether the stamp duty value was proposed to be treated under Section 56(2)(x)(a) or Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act. This lack of specificity deprived the petitioner of a reasonable opportunity to respond effectively. Additionally, the assessment order failed to mention Section 56(2)(x) of the Act in its operative part, indicating a deviation from the grounds stated in the show cause notice. The court emphasized that the issuance of a show cause notice is not an empty formality and serves the purpose of providing a fair opportunity to the affected party.
Deemed income u/s 56(2)(x) - Defective Show cause notice - Addition of Unexplained investment u/s 69 - charged to tax u/s 115BBE - The High Court found that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner was defective as it did not specify whether the stamp duty value was proposed to be treated under Section 56(2)(x)(a) or Section 56(2)(x)(b) of the Act. This lack of specificity deprived the petitioner of a reasonable opportunity to respond effectively. Additionally, the assessment order failed to mention Section 56(2)(x) of the Act in its operative part, indicating a deviation from the grounds stated in the show cause notice. The court emphasized that the issuance of a show cause notice is not an empty formality and serves the purpose of providing a fair opportunity to the affected party.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.