Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Rectification u/s 154 - The Assessee argued that the assessments u/s 143(1) and 143(3) merged, precluding further additions u/s 154, while the Revenue contended that they were distinct assessments. The Tribunal found that there was no merger between the assessments and upheld the validity of the rectification u/s 154. It concluded that the additions made under Section 143(1) were not revisited during the assessment u/s 143(3), necessitating rectification to correct the apparent error. The Tribunal differentiated the present case from previous precedents and dismissed the Assessee's appeal.
Rectification u/s 154 - The Assessee argued that the assessments u/s 143(1) and 143(3) merged, precluding further additions u/s 154, while the Revenue contended that they were distinct assessments. The Tribunal found that there was no merger between the assessments and upheld the validity of the rectification u/s 154. It concluded that the additions made under Section 143(1) were not revisited during the assessment u/s 143(3), necessitating rectification to correct the apparent error. The Tribunal differentiated the present case from previous precedents and dismissed the Assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
