Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Legal implication of a promotional trailer - absence of specific content from the trailer in the movie - promotional trailer is an offer or a promise - unfair trade practice - The Supreme Court clarified that a promotional trailer is unilateral and does not constitute an offer or contract. It serves to encourage viewers to purchase tickets for the movie but does not create any binding agreement regarding the content of the film. The Court held that there was no deficiency of service as the transaction of purchasing a movie ticket was independent of the promotional trailer. The absence of specific content from the trailer in the movie did not amount to a breach of contract or deficiency in the service provided.
Legal implication of a promotional trailer - absence of specific content from the trailer in the movie - promotional trailer is an offer or a promise - unfair trade practice - The Supreme Court clarified that a promotional trailer is unilateral and does not constitute an offer or contract. It serves to encourage viewers to purchase tickets for the movie but does not create any binding agreement regarding the content of the film. The Court held that there was no deficiency of service as the transaction of purchasing a movie ticket was independent of the promotional trailer. The absence of specific content from the trailer in the movie did not amount to a breach of contract or deficiency in the service provided.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
