Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Demand of GST - The High court noted that the return of documents raised a disputed question of fact, which could not be decided in the writ jurisdiction without further evidence. For the period from July 2017 to March 2018, the court granted the petitioner protection similar to that in a previous case. However, for the period from April 2018 to January 2023, the court dismissed the writ petition, citing the existence of a statutory alternative remedy of appeal. The court did not find grounds to entertain the writ petition for this period.
Demand of GST - The High court noted that the return of documents raised a disputed question of fact, which could not be decided in the writ jurisdiction without further evidence. For the period from July 2017 to March 2018, the court granted the petitioner protection similar to that in a previous case. However, for the period from April 2018 to January 2023, the court dismissed the writ petition, citing the existence of a statutory alternative remedy of appeal. The court did not find grounds to entertain the writ petition for this period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.