Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Demand of GST - The High court noted that the return of documents raised a disputed question of fact, which could not be decided in the writ jurisdiction without further evidence. For the period from July 2017 to March 2018, the court granted the petitioner protection similar to that in a previous case. However, for the period from April 2018 to January 2023, the court dismissed the writ petition, citing the existence of a statutory alternative remedy of appeal. The court did not find grounds to entertain the writ petition for this period.
Demand of GST - The High court noted that the return of documents raised a disputed question of fact, which could not be decided in the writ jurisdiction without further evidence. For the period from July 2017 to March 2018, the court granted the petitioner protection similar to that in a previous case. However, for the period from April 2018 to January 2023, the court dismissed the writ petition, citing the existence of a statutory alternative remedy of appeal. The court did not find grounds to entertain the writ petition for this period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.