Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated 28.03.2022, which had become final. Therefore, there was no basis for initiating a subsequent re-assessment proceeding. The Court held that in the absence of any declaration annulling or setting aside the previous re-assessment order, the Assessing Authority lacked jurisdiction to issue the second re-assessment notice. Thus, the proceedings initiated through the notice dated 30.07.2022 were declared as without jurisdiction and nullity.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated 28.03.2022, which had become final. Therefore, there was no basis for initiating a subsequent re-assessment proceeding. The Court held that in the absence of any declaration annulling or setting aside the previous re-assessment order, the Assessing Authority lacked jurisdiction to issue the second re-assessment notice. Thus, the proceedings initiated through the notice dated 30.07.2022 were declared as without jurisdiction and nullity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.