Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS u/s 194H - Higher rate of TDS @20% in absence of PAN - Commission paid to Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society (PACS) - The Tribunal examined the nature of transactions between the appellant and PACS. It found that the State Government, through its nodal agencies, controlled and directed the activities of PACS in procuring food grains, indicating an agency relationship. Consequently, the commission paid by the appellant to PACS was deemed liable for TDS under Section 194H. It also observed errors in the calculation of TDS, considering that PACS likely had PAN details and that the commission rate was not accurately applied.
TDS u/s 194H - Higher rate of TDS @20% in absence of PAN - Commission paid to Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society (PACS) - The Tribunal examined the nature of transactions between the appellant and PACS. It found that the State Government, through its nodal agencies, controlled and directed the activities of PACS in procuring food grains, indicating an agency relationship. Consequently, the commission paid by the appellant to PACS was deemed liable for TDS under Section 194H. It also observed errors in the calculation of TDS, considering that PACS likely had PAN details and that the commission rate was not accurately applied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.