Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Rejection of application filed by the Appellant (Suspended Director) before the Adjudicating Authority - Challenging the authority of another director's actions and Approval of Resolution Plan CIRP - The tribunal finds that the original order dismissing the appellant's application overlooked critical facts and allegations of unauthorized and potentially fraudulent actions by the involved directors. The Tribunal sets aside the lower tribunal's order for failing to consider these issues adequately and not providing the appellant a fair opportunity to contest the unauthorized actions and their implications on the insolvency process.
Rejection of application filed by the Appellant (Suspended Director) before the Adjudicating Authority - Challenging the authority of another director's actions and Approval of Resolution Plan CIRP - The tribunal finds that the original order dismissing the appellant's application overlooked critical facts and allegations of unauthorized and potentially fraudulent actions by the involved directors. The Tribunal sets aside the lower tribunal's order for failing to consider these issues adequately and not providing the appellant a fair opportunity to contest the unauthorized actions and their implications on the insolvency process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.