Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Rejection of application filed by the Appellant (Suspended Director) before the Adjudicating Authority - Challenging the authority of another director's actions and Approval of Resolution Plan CIRP - The tribunal finds that the original order dismissing the appellant's application overlooked critical facts and allegations of unauthorized and potentially fraudulent actions by the involved directors. The Tribunal sets aside the lower tribunal's order for failing to consider these issues adequately and not providing the appellant a fair opportunity to contest the unauthorized actions and their implications on the insolvency process.
Rejection of application filed by the Appellant (Suspended Director) before the Adjudicating Authority - Challenging the authority of another director's actions and Approval of Resolution Plan CIRP - The tribunal finds that the original order dismissing the appellant's application overlooked critical facts and allegations of unauthorized and potentially fraudulent actions by the involved directors. The Tribunal sets aside the lower tribunal's order for failing to consider these issues adequately and not providing the appellant a fair opportunity to contest the unauthorized actions and their implications on the insolvency process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.