Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of Section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor - time limitation - Section 10A of IBC - The Tribunal found that apart from the lease rental of April 2021, the entire claim fell within the Section 10A period, rendering the application invalid. It also noted the contradiction in admitting the application after rejecting the Amendment Application, which acknowledged the Section 10A bar. Additionally, it clarified that the default must precede the issuance of the demand notice for the application to be valid under Section 9(1). As the default was claimed to have occurred before the notice, the application was deemed barred by Section 10A.
Admission of Section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor - time limitation - Section 10A of IBC - The Tribunal found that apart from the lease rental of April 2021, the entire claim fell within the Section 10A period, rendering the application invalid. It also noted the contradiction in admitting the application after rejecting the Amendment Application, which acknowledged the Section 10A bar. Additionally, it clarified that the default must precede the issuance of the demand notice for the application to be valid under Section 9(1). As the default was claimed to have occurred before the notice, the application was deemed barred by Section 10A.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
