Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of Section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor - time limitation - Section 10A of IBC - The Tribunal found that apart from the lease rental of April 2021, the entire claim fell within the Section 10A period, rendering the application invalid. It also noted the contradiction in admitting the application after rejecting the Amendment Application, which acknowledged the Section 10A bar. Additionally, it clarified that the default must precede the issuance of the demand notice for the application to be valid under Section 9(1). As the default was claimed to have occurred before the notice, the application was deemed barred by Section 10A.
Admission of Section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor - time limitation - Section 10A of IBC - The Tribunal found that apart from the lease rental of April 2021, the entire claim fell within the Section 10A period, rendering the application invalid. It also noted the contradiction in admitting the application after rejecting the Amendment Application, which acknowledged the Section 10A bar. Additionally, it clarified that the default must precede the issuance of the demand notice for the application to be valid under Section 9(1). As the default was claimed to have occurred before the notice, the application was deemed barred by Section 10A.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.